Friday, February 22, 2008

On Knee Jerk reactions

Avi Shafran writes in

What Remains (Cross-Currents): "Because all that many, if not most, of the Jewish Week’s readers will likely ever remember about the entire business will be a
mendacious headline. Despite all the setting straight of facts, what will remain
in minds – not to mention in the eternal echo-chamber of cyberspace – will be
only those deceptive, in fact slanderous, words."


Shafran is writing about the distortions in a report that evaluated sexual abuse in the Orthodox community. Shafran took issue with the methodology and has received some level of support from the authors of the report.

This post is a response to the responses to Shafran original article. As he points out, many respondents took umbrage at what they saw as a willingness to cover-up abuse in the Orthodox community.

What I note is the last paragraph, which reminds me that it is far too easy to assume that we know who the enemy is and what he will say. We speak far too often and listen far too little. I don't agree with R' Shafran on many, many issues, but I find him routinely insightful and his input is invaluable.

Friday, February 01, 2008

Freedom of Expression - especially when it hurts

I just saw an article from the JTA in which a book that is reputedly rabidly anti-religion would be banned with the blessing of the Jewish Council:

Stephan Kramer, secretary general of the Central Council of Jews in
Germany, said he thought the book was equally mean to all three faiths. "It is
simply anti-religious… and militantly atheistic," he said in a statement. "What
is perfidious and dangerous is that it uses very attractive graphics to appeal
to young children, who are not able to respond to such anti-religious
baiting."


This is an issue to be handled in Germany, by Germans, but it illustrates once again that Freedom of Expression is easy when nothing particularly hurtful is said. It really counts when you find the content and/or form of the message repugnant. Banning books, no matter how mean-spirited, is worse than the reputed harm that the book may cause.